DiddyDocket Dispatch
Sean Combs v. NBCUniversal Media et al.
New York Supreme Court No. 151935/2025 Justice Phaedra F. Perry-Bond
Oct 1, 2026

Combs v. NBCUniversal: Defendants Seek $990,292 in Attorneys’ Fees After Dismissal; Motion Fully Briefed

N.Y. Sup. Ct. · Index No. 151935/2025 · Fee Motion Filed May 20, 2026; Reply Filed Aug. 5, 2026

← All Dispatches

In the matter of Combs v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Peacock TV LLC and Ample, LLC, Index No. 151935/2025 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cnty.), the defendants have asked Justice Phaedra F. Perry-Bond to award them $990,292 in attorneys’ fees for defeating Sean “Diddy” Combs’s defamation suit over the documentary Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy. Combs asks the court to wait for the First Department to decide his appeal and, if it rules now, to award no more than $166,769.25. Briefing closed on Aug. 5, 2026; the court’s calendar shows the motion fully submitted on its Aug. 6 return date, and no ruling appears on the docket. (ECF Nos. 148–152, 157–165.)

Background

The court dismissed Combs’s amended complaint on Apr. 20, 2026, and directed the defendants to file a fee application under Civil Rights Law § 70-a, the fee-shifting provision of New York’s anti-SLAPP law. (ECF No. 142 at 12; see Dispatch 7.) The defendants write that where a defendant prevails on such a motion, an award of fees is “mandatory, not discretionary.” (ECF No. 149 ¶ 4.) They filed the motion on May 20. Its notice set a July 21 return date, with opposition due June 19 and reply July 20 (ECF No. 148). Two stipulations, so-ordered by the court, moved the deadlines to July 6 and Aug. 5 (ECF Nos. 154, 156), and the court’s calendar shows the July 21 date adjourned to Aug. 6.

The Request

The defendants seek $927,448 for 777.5 hours worked by six Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP lawyers from Feb. 25, 2025, through May 20, 2026, at hourly rates of $1,980 for Theodore Boutrous, $1,420 for Connor Sullivan and Katie Townsend, $1,165 for Zachary Freund, $1,060 for Connor Mui and $915 for Elise Blegen. (ECF No. 149 ¶¶ 5–7, 12.) They state that these rates are “significantly lower than Gibson Dunn’s customary billing rates.” (Id. ¶ 12.)

The affirmation breaks the hours into five phases: 290.7 on the first motion to dismiss, which Combs’s amended complaint superseded; 130.2 on the second; 138 on the reply; 190.2 preparing for the Apr. 17 argument; and 28.4 on the fee application itself. (Id. ¶¶ 23–36.) On Aug. 5, the defendants added $62,844 for 54.3 hours spent on the reply papers, for a total of $990,292. (ECF No. 163 ¶¶ 5–6.)

Combs’s Opposition

Combs opposed on July 6. His brief states that the Apr. 20 order “was wrongly decided,” points to his appeal (No. 2026-03017), and asks the court to “abstain from ruling on Defendants’ fee request until the First Department has ruled on Plaintiff’s appeal.” (ECF No. 157 at 1.) On the amount, he argues that the rates exceed those prevailing in New York for comparable work and proposes $800, $650, $500, $425 and $350 per hour, in descending order of seniority. (Id. at 8.) He cites Gibson Dunn’s fee request in a New Jersey defamation case, Satz v. Starr, at $460 an hour for a partner. (Id. at 6; ECF Nos. 158–160.)

On hours, he calls 777.5 “a staggering number of hours” for a pre-discovery motion on a single claim, argues that six lawyers duplicated one another’s work, and asks for a 50 percent across-the-board cut and removal of all of Townsend’s time. (Id. at 8, 23.) He compares the request with the $392,638.69 awarded in Trump v. Trump, which he describes as the largest such award in a New York state action that he knows of. (Id. at 17–18.) He also argues that the statute does not authorize fees for preparing the fee application: “Nowhere does the statute explicitly authorize fees on fees.” (Id. at 22.)

The Defendants’ Reply

The defendants write that Combs “does not dispute that Defendants are entitled to fees.” (ECF No. 162 at 1.) They cite New York federal decisions approving Gibson Dunn partner rates “up to $1,915 per hour,” adjust older awards for legal-services inflation using a Bureau of Labor Statistics index, and argue that Satz reflects New Jersey rates. (Id. at 3–7.) They state that Combs demanded “not less than $100,000,000” and that the fees sought are “less than 1%” of that amount. (Id. at 8.) On fees for the fee application, they cite Golan v. Daily News, in which a New York County court held that “fees on fees are permitted” under the statute. (Id. at 12.)

What Is Pending

Besides the fee motion, Combs’s appeal of the dismissal is pending in the First Department. (ECF No. 157 at 1.) On Sept. 18, Sher Tremonte moved by proposed order to show cause to withdraw as Combs’s counsel in this action. Michael Tremonte’s affirmation states that Combs “has deliberately disregarded his obligation to pay Sher Tremonte’s legal fees and expenses” and that there has been “a total breakdown in cooperation and communication.” (ECF No. 167 ¶¶ 4–5.) Justice Perry-Bond signed the order on Sept. 21. Its handwritten entries set Oct. 16 for answering papers and Oct. 23 as the return date, and note “Submission only - no appearance on return date.” (ECF No. 168.) The court’s calendar lists Oct. 23 as “SUBMISSIONS - NO APPEARANCE.”

Counsel and Sources

Sean Combs is represented by Michael Tremonte, Erica A. Wolff and Benjamin J. Shack Sackler of Sher Tremonte LLP, which has moved to withdraw. NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Peacock TV LLC and Ample, LLC are represented by Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Katie Townsend and Connor S. Sullivan of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Source: ECF Nos. 142, 148, 149, 154, 156, 157–160, 162, 163 and 166–168 on the Combs v. NBCUniversal docket.

Diddy Docket reports on public court records. Parties are presumed innocent or not liable unless proven otherwise. This is not legal advice.

Related cases
Sourcing
Share: X / Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

← All Dispatches