DiddyDocket Dispatch
Erik Mishiyev v. Sean Combs
Florida Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County No. 2025-009778-CA-01 Judge Lisa A. Walsh
Sep 29, 2026

Mishiyev v. Combs: Florida Court Dismisses All Claims Against Combs With Prejudice

Order · Sept. 8, 2026 — third complaint fails as to Combs; the case continues against other defendants

← All Dispatches

In the matter of Erik Mishiyev v. Sean Combs, et al., No. 2025-009778-CA-01 (Fla. 11th Jud. Cir., Miami-Dade Cnty.), Circuit Judge Lisa Walsh on Sept. 8, 2026 dismissed with prejudice all claims against Sean Combs in Mishiyev's second amended complaint. (Dkt. 364.) "With prejudice" means the claims cannot be filed again in this court. The order covers Combs only: a motion to dismiss from co-defendant We The Best Music, Inc. is pending, and the court has separately ordered Mishiyev to show cause why he should not be held in contempt over emailing court staff.

Background

Mishiyev, who performs as DJ Short-E and represents himself, sued Combs and Bad Boy Entertainment in May 2025. His latest complaint names six defendants, alleges that they "conspired to ‘ruin’ the Plaintiffs livelihood and ‘Blacklist’ him," and seeks more than $50 million on eight counts. (Dkt. 271 at 1, 3.) After a Jan. 27, 2026 hearing, the court granted Combs's first motion to dismiss without prejudice and gave Mishiyev 20 days to amend. (Dkt. 97 at 1.) On June 29, 2026, it dismissed the amended complaint too: Count I, a Florida Civil Rights Act claim of "antisemitism," with prejudice, and the rest with 10 days to replead. (Dkt. 232 at 6.)

The Order

The second amended complaint was filed July 23, which the court described as "two weeks after the Court-imposed deadline." (Dkt. 364 at 2.) After a hearing on Combs's motions to reconsider the leave to amend and to dismiss the new pleading with prejudice, the court granted dismissal and denied reconsideration as moot, acknowledging that it had allowed the June amendment "under the misapprehension that no prior leave to amend had been previously granted," and finding the new pleading "untimely" and one that "corrects none of the defects pointed out in the Court's prior orders." (Id.)

The court first called the complaint "an improper shotgun pleading," meaning one that does not tell each defendant which claims are made against it, that "fails to give Mr. Combs adequate notice of the claims against him and the grounds upon which each claim rests." (Id. at 2.) It then went count by count. The civil-rights claim failed "primarily" because Mishiyev did not exhaust administrative remedies, a defect the court said "cannot be cured"; the business-interference claim was "identical" to the earlier one. (Id. at 3.) The complaint "fails to allege a single actionable statement attributable to Mr. Combs," and the court called an alleged remark that Combs thinks Mishiyev is a "culture vulture" "a nonactionable opinion." (Id. at 4-5.) On fraud, it recalled telling Mishiyev in January: "If other people are induced to do something, then maybe they have a cause of action, but you don’t." (Id. at 6.)

The court added that proceeding without a lawyer "does not excuse these failures," and concluded that Mishiyev "has been given three chances to plead cognizable claims against Mr. Combs," that "granting further leave to amend would be futile," and that the case "is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against Mr. Combs." (Id. at 6-7.)

Mishiyev's Position

The docket lists several responses opposing the motions to dismiss (Dkts. 331, 340, 353). The same day as the order, Mishiyev filed a notice of appeal to the Third District Court of Appeal from what it calls "an order granting Defendants’ Sean Combs Motions to dismiss with Prejudice," stating that "Plaintiffs have listed numerous short and plain statements of the ultimate facts." (Dkt. 365 at 1.) He also filed an application for civil indigent status (Dkt. 366). In a Sept. 17 filing, Mishiyev wrote that "Defendants Bad Boy Entertainment and Davis and Khaled have still avoided service in this case." (Dkt. 374 at 2.)

The Other Defendants

On Sept. 13, We The Best Music moved to dismiss the same complaint with prejudice. (Dkt. 371 at 3-4.) Its motion states that Khaled, also a named defendant, "has not yet been served." (Id. at 3.) The complaint added two defendants, Arlandal Davis and Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (id.); the docket lists affidavits of service for Beasley (Dkts. 287, 313).

The Contempt Hearing

On Aug. 11, 2026, the court ordered Mishiyev to stop emailing judicial staff except to seek hearing time: "No communications should take place between a single litigant and judicial staff having anything to do with the substance of the case." (Dkt. 293 at 1.) The order warned of sanctions "which may include dismissal of this action." (Id. at 2.) On Sept. 11, the court found that "Mr. Mishiyev is in violation of this order" and directed him to "show cause why he should not be held in indirect civil contempt for violating the Court’s August 11, 2026 order (DE 293)." (Dkt. 370 at 2.) Indirect contempt generally covers conduct outside the judge's presence; civil contempt is aimed at compelling compliance with an order. The hearing is set for Oct. 2, 2026 at 8:45 a.m. in Courtroom 16D. (Dkt. 373 at 1.) The docket shows no ruling yet.

Counsel and Sources

Mishiyev appears without counsel. Combs and Bad Boy Entertainment are represented by Erica A. Wolff and Amanda Greenfield of Sher Tremonte LLP; We The Best Music by Michael J. McMullen and Bradford M. Cohen of Cohen & McMullen, P.A. Sources: the Mishiyev v. Combs docket, including Dkts. 97, 232, 271, 293, 364, 365, 370, 371, 373 and 374.

Diddy Docket reports on public court records. Parties are presumed innocent or not liable unless proven otherwise. This is not legal advice.

Related cases
Sourcing
Share: X / Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

← All Dispatches