DiddyDocket Dispatch
Tucker v. Combs et al. + 3 related cases
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York No. 1:24-cv-07772 Judge J. Paul Oetken
Oct 24, 2026

Tucker and Doe v. Combs: Judge Oetken Grants Sher Tremonte’s Withdrawal in Two Cases; Judge Buchwald Orders Combs to Show Cause in Two More

S.D.N.Y. · Nos. 1:24-cv-07772, 1:24-cv-07774, 1:24-cv-07776, 1:24-cv-08812 · Orders of Oct. 22 and 23, 2026

← All Dispatches

In the matter of Tucker v. Combs, No. 1:24-cv-07772, and Doe v. Combs, Nos. 1:24-cv-07774, 1:24-cv-07776 and 1:24-cv-08812 (S.D.N.Y.), two judges have acted on Sher Tremonte LLP’s requests to withdraw as counsel for Sean “Diddy” Combs, and they did it differently. On Oct. 22, 2026, United States District Judge J. Paul Oetken granted the firm’s motions in Nos. 1:24-cv-07772 and 1:24-cv-07774. On Oct. 23, United States District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald did not rule. In Nos. 1:24-cv-07776 and 1:24-cv-08812 she ordered the defendants to show cause by Nov. 23, 2026 why the firm should not be allowed to withdraw and found to hold a retaining lien. (Nos. 1:24-cv-07772, ECF No. 84; 1:24-cv-07774, ECF No. 86; 1:24-cv-07776, ECF No. 77; 1:24-cv-08812, ECF No. 47.)

Background

Four men sued Combs in October and November 2024, each under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act. Their allegations are unproven. Three are captioned Doe; the court’s order in No. 1:24-cv-07772 uses the name Tucker.

  1. No. 1:24-cv-07772: a Georgia man alleges he was sexually assaulted by several men at a New York City party in or around October 2021, after one drink left him disoriented, and recalls seeing Combs during the assault. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 23, 36–45.)
  2. No. 1:24-cv-07774: an Ohio man alleges that in or around May 2008, in a Manhattan department-store stockroom, Combs and bodyguards physically assaulted him and Combs sexually assaulted him. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 24, 38–48.)
  3. No. 1:24-cv-07776: a New Jersey man alleges that in August 2006, while working a security job at Combs’s East Hampton property, he was sexually assaulted by Combs. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 23, 35–44.)
  4. No. 1:24-cv-08812: a Texas man alleges that in October 2001, at a Manhattan hotel, after a drink at a casting meeting, he lost consciousness and was sexually assaulted. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 23, 36–40.)

Related: Jones, Doe and Sapp.

Judge Oetken’s Orders

The firm moved on Sept. 23 in No. 1:24-cv-07772 (ECF No. 79) and on Oct. 7 in No. 1:24-cv-07774 (ECF No. 83). Counsel moved “citing nonpayment of legal fees and a breakdown of communication with Combs,” and “[n]either Plaintiff nor Combs has filed any opposition. Finding good cause for counsel’s withdrawal, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion.” (No. 1:24-cv-07772, ECF No. 84 at 1.) They require:

  1. New counsel or a pro se letter. “Within four weeks of the date of this order, Combs shall have new counsel appear or file a letter stating that he will appear pro se (that is, representing himself), with contact information.”
  2. Service on Combs. Within seven days, the firm must serve the order on Combs “by emailing a copy to Combs’s power of attorney and by USPS Priority Mail to Defendant’s current facility mailing address.”
  3. Counsel terminated. The clerk is to terminate four Sher Tremonte lawyers as counsel.

No. 1:24-cv-07774 adds a requirement for seven Combs companies, which the order calls the “Entity Defendants.” They “must be represented by attorneys to appear in this matter because they are corporate entities,” and the order warns that “[f]ailure to appear through counsel may result in the entry of default judgment against the Entity Defendants.” (No. 1:24-cv-07774, ECF No. 86 at 2.) Neither order mentions a retaining lien, an amount owed or successor counsel.

Judge Buchwald’s Orders to Show Cause

Judge Buchwald acted on motions the firm filed Oct. 7 in No. 1:24-cv-07776 (ECF Nos. 74–75) and Oct. 15 in No. 1:24-cv-08812 (ECF Nos. 44–45). Her orders are identical. After reciting service on the defendants by email to the holder of Combs’s power of attorney and by USPS Priority Mail Express to Combs at FCI Fort Dix, each states:

“ORDERED that defendants show cause by November 23, 2026, why an order should not be issued pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.4 … permitting Sher Tremonte LLP to withdraw as counsel of record in this matter; … determining that Sher Tremonte LLP has a retaining lien in the amount of its reasonable unpaid expenditures related to this matter to date.” (No. 1:24-cv-07776, ECF No. 77 at 2.)

A retaining lien is a law firm’s right to hold a client’s files until its fees are paid; another judge granted one in Kelly v. Combs. The caption in No. 1:24-cv-08812 names Bad Boy Records LLC as a defendant; the order’s recital of service does not list it. (ECF No. 47 at 1.)

What Is Next

In Nos. 1:24-cv-07772 and 1:24-cv-07774, new counsel or a pro se letter is due within four weeks of Oct. 22. In the other two, the date is Nov. 23, 2026, and the orders set no hearing. The dockets show no response from any party in those two cases.

Counsel and Sources

Counsel: Antigone Curis, Curis Law, PLLC; the Buzbee Law Firm (Christopher J. Leavitt, Ryan S. Pigg, David C. Fortney, Thomas Colby Holler and Crystal Del Toro); and Andrew Van Arsdale, AVA Law Group, for the plaintiffs. Sher Tremonte LLP (Michael Tremonte, Erica Wolff, Mark Cuccaro and Raphael Friedman) for Combs. Sources: the orders on the dockets for 7772, 7774, 7776 and 8812; allegations from each complaint (ECF No. 1).

Diddy Docket reports on public court records. Parties are presumed innocent or not liable unless proven otherwise. This is not legal advice.

Related cases
Sourcing
Share: X / Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

← All Dispatches